Patient Information Resources


Northwestern Medicine Orthopaedics
27650 Ferry Road
Suite 100
Warrenville, IL 60555
Ph: 630.225.2663






Ankle
Child Orthopedics
Elbow
Foot
Fractures
General
Hand
Hip
Knee
Pain Management
Shoulder
Spine - Cervical
Spine - General
Spine - Lumbar
Spine - Thoracic
Wrist

View Web RX

« Back

I'm going to have a spinal fusion I guess is a little tricky: L5 to S1. The surgeon showed me a 3-D video about how the procedure is done. I'm starting to have second thoughts about this. Is it really safe? Could I end up worse than before?

There are many different ways to fuse the spine depending on the spinal level of concern, surgeon experience and expertise, need for instrumentation (e.g., metal plates, cages, rods, screws), and patient size (obesity makes an anterior approach more difficult). Studies have been done comparing different approaches (e.g., anterior, posterior, transforaminal, interbody). While each one has its advantages and disadvantages, the overall results seem to be similar across the board. Complications can occur in any surgery but spinal fusion is by and large quite successful. The area you mentioned (L5S1) can present a challenge because the pelvic bone (ilium) is so large and obstructs the area from the side. Some surgeons are now using what's called a transaxial approach to fusing L5S1. A lateral incision is made and the surgeon goes through the psoas muscle (hip flexor along the front of the spine). The disc is removed from this vantage point and the spine fused using a minimally invasive system called axial lumbar interbody fusion or AxiaLIF. There are some technical challenges and complications reported but it should be noted that not everyone experiences these. Injury is possible to the group of nerves or blood vessels to the pelvis and legs. Damage could occur to any of the muscles that are transected in order to get to the spine. Most problems are temporary and last less than a month. Occasionally, a patient will have a symptom that lasts as much as a year but this is unusual. After reviewing many studies on lumbar fusion from 1950 to 2010, it is clear that more studies are needed to directly compare different fusion methods. There is not enough evidence at this point to say one approach is superior to the others. Tissue engineering and tissue regeneration may eventually replace surgical fusion. Such advanced biologic techniques could eliminate nerve or other soft tissue damage caused by currently used surgical methods.

References:

« Back





*Disclaimer:*The information contained herein is compiled from a variety of sources. It may not be complete or timely. It does not cover all diseases, physical conditions, ailments or treatments. The information should NOT be used in place of visit with your healthcare provider, nor should you disregard the advice of your health care provider because of any information you read in this topic.


All content provided by eORTHOPOD® is a registered trademark of Mosaic Medical Group, L.L.C.. Content is the sole property of Mosaic Medical Group, LLC and used herein by permission.