Patient Information Resources


Spine Institute
Glendale Adventist Medical Center
1500 E. Chevy Chase Drive, Suite 401B
Glendale, CA 91206
Ph: (818) 863-4444






Spine - Cervical
Spine - General
Spine - Lumbar
Spine - Thoracic

View Web RX

« Back

New Ceramic Graft Substitute Not Recommended

Posted on: 04/18/2008
Scientists are studying new materials to replace bone graft for use in spinal fusion surgery. In this study, Chitra-HABg, a glass ceramic composite was used on one side of the spine. Natural bone graft harvested from the patient's own pelvic bone. This is called an autologous bone graft. The harvested bone was placed on the other side of the spine.

Patients were followed for a full year. But it quickly became apparent that the ceramic graft substitute was being absorbed by the body without bone to replace it. Fusion failed on the ceramic side of the spine. As a result, the study was ended early.

Biodegradable, bioactive ceramic substitutes such as Chitra-HABg combine the best mechanical and biologic properties of various ceramics available. But it can't be used alone as a bone graft substitute.

Researchers will continue to explore ways to avoid using autologous bone grafts. The complications at the donor site are often the biggest problem patients have after spinal fusion.

Bone substitutes must be porous in weight and structure like the surrounding bone. New bone grows into the interconnecting pores in the bone. A microlock forms between new and old bone. Autologous bone takes three months to a year to form a solid fusion. Bone graft substitutes or graft extenders must provide equally rapid growth of new bone.

Glass ceramic seems like a good choice for a bone substitute material. It is strong and provides a chemical surface that allows for new bone cells to stick. But it appears that new bone doesn't go deep enough into the ceramic. It may be a problem with in-growth but it could be that the ceramic is too thick.

Other factors in the failure of fusion to occur with Chitra-HABg include poor local bone growth, too large of a soft tissue gap to fill in, and too small of a bone surface area for fusion to occur within. Despite more than three years of clinical trials, the makers of this ceramic bone substitute are back to the drawing board.

References:
Narayana K. Acharya DNB (Ortho), et al. Hydroxyapatite-Bioactive Glass Ceramic Composite as Stand-Alone Graft Substitute for Posterolateral Fusion of Lumbar Spine: A Prospective, Matched, and Controlled Study. In Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. April 2008. Vol. 21. No. 2. Pp. 106-111.

« Back





*Disclaimer:*The information contained herein is compiled from a variety of sources. It may not be complete or timely. It does not cover all diseases, physical conditions, ailments or treatments. The information should NOT be used in place of visit with your healthcare provider, nor should you disregard the advice of your health care provider because of any information you read in this topic.


All content provided by eORTHOPOD® is a registered trademark of Mosaic Medical Group, L.L.C.. Content is the sole property of Mosaic Medical Group, LLC and used herein by permission.