What's the biggest drawback to the newer minimally-invasive joint replacements?

Many possible disadvantages have been reported. Most have to do with the small visual field. Some relate to learning a new method. Surgeons often have better results the more times they do the operation. Early attempts may have poorer results or more complications.

Sometimes one factor leads to another and another. For example, it might take longer to do a surgery that's new to the surgeon. Longer operating time means longer exposure to anesthesia. Longer surgery time also leads to higher risk for blood clot or infection.

Overall not being able to see clearly inside and around the joint is the surgeon's biggest drawback. Finding the anatomy to guide each incision makes a difference. Implant placement and function depends on finding the landmarks and vital structures.

Reference: 

Brian McGrory, MD, et al. Editorial: Minimally Invasive and Small-incision Joint Replacement Surgery. In Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. November 2005. No. 440. Pp. 251-254.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is not intended to replace the advice or care from a healthcare provider. The information on this website is compiled from a variety of sources. It may not be complete or timely. It does not cover all diseases, physical conditions, ailments, or treatments. The information should NOT be used in place of visiting with your healthcare provider, nor should you disregard the advice of your healthcare provider because of any information you obtain on this website. Discuss any activities presented in this website with your healthcare provider before engaging in the activity.